Analysis Group Manager Interview: Complete Guide
Analysis Group interviews test whether you can reason like a testifying economist: identify the counterfactual, choose an identification strategy (difference-in-differences, synthetic control, event study), and explain a damages calculation a federal judge would actually find admissible under the Daubert standard.
Rounds
2
Each lasts
45-60 minutes
Format
Interviewer-led
Watch for
Economics Focus
Analysis Group 2026 recruiting calendar
Cycle openApps are live. Most successful Analysis Group candidates start case practice 6-8 weeks before the deadline.
Key Insight: Interviewer-Led Format
Analysis Group uses an interviewer-ledformat, which means the interviewer controls the pace and direction of the case. Unlike candidate-led firms, you'll receive specific questions rather than driving the analysis yourself. For Manager candidates, this means demonstrating flexibility and rapid adaptation to interviewer pivots.
What Managers Do at Analysis Group
Mid-level leadership role for candidates with 5-8 years of experience. Managers oversee multiple workstreams, own client relationships, and drive project delivery.
- •Project management and delivery
- •Client relationship ownership
- •Team leadership and development
- •Business development support
- •Senior stakeholder management
Interview Process
- 1First round (often a technical phone screen followed by in-person)
Conducted by: Manager / Vice President
Two 45-60 minute interviews mixing case-style economic reasoning with technical probes on econometrics, statistics, and microeconomic theory. Expect a hands-on data or modelling component — candidates with Stata / R / Python experience are openly preferred for the Associate track.
- 2Final round
Conducted by: Principal / Managing Principal
Two to three interviews. Senior staff probe on the research judgment required for expert-witness support: which methodology to choose, what robustness checks a federal judge expects, and how to communicate econometric results to non-technical audiences. PhD candidates get a deeper research-discussion round.
Skills Analysis Group tests in this round
Tap a skill to jump straight to the drill or guide that builds it.
What Makes Analysis Group Different
Economics Focus
A key element of the Analysis Group interview process.
Litigation Support
A key element of the Analysis Group interview process.
Quantitative Rigor
A key element of the Analysis Group interview process.
Sample Analysis Group Cases
Case 1: A regional hospital alleges a rival health system's exclusive payor contracts fo…
Prompt: A regional hospital alleges a rival health system's exclusive payor contracts foreclosed competition between 2018 and 2022. You're advising the plaintiff's economics expert. How would you design the damages analysis, and what identification concerns do you anticipate?
How to structure: Analysis Group cases want a rigorous econometric frame, not a strategy structure. Start by stating the counterfactual explicitly: what would the plaintiff's revenue have been absent the challenged conduct? Propose an identification strategy — difference-in-differences using comparable non-affected markets, or synthetic control if comparables are weak — and name the threats to identification (parallel-trends, spillovers, endogenous market definition). Close with the damages calculation structure: lost-profits vs. lost-business-value, discount rate, pre/post-judgment interest.
What a strong answer sounds like: A strong candidate names the identification strategy before the damages model, anticipates at least two Daubert-style methodological attacks (e.g., 'defense will argue the control markets aren't parallel because of demographic drift'), and proposes a robustness check per concern. They close by framing damages as the testifiable question ('what number would I defend on cross-examination?'), not a back-of-envelope delta.
Common weakness: Candidates who treat this like a business strategy case — 'I'd look at market share and pricing' — miss the point. Analysis Group isn't asking what happened; they're asking how you'd prove what would have happened in a rigorous, courtroom-admissible way.
What interviewers actually evaluate:
- States the counterfactual before any analysis
- Names a specific identification strategy (difference-in-differences, synthetic control, event study) and justifies the choice
- Anticipates Daubert standard challenges to the methodology
- Distinguishes lost profits from lost business value
- Knows what discount rate and interest conventions federal courts expect
Case 2: A proposed antitrust class of direct purchasers alleges a cartel inflated drug p…
Prompt: A proposed antitrust class of direct purchasers alleges a cartel inflated drug prices by 10-15% between 2015 and 2020. You're working on class certification. What would you need to show the court, and how would you structure the economic analysis?
How to structure: Class certification cases turn on whether impact (overcharge pass-through) can be shown using common, class-wide evidence — the Comcast v. Behrend standard. Structure: (1) theoretical model of overcharge pass-through, (2) empirical test using transaction-level data showing the overcharge reached all or substantially all class members, (3) damages model that maps the overcharge to individual purchases in a mechanical way. Expect a probe on how you'd handle intra-class variation without blowing up commonality.
What interviewers actually evaluate:
- Frames class certification as an econometric question, not a legal one
- Knows the economic meaning of commonality / predominance
- Distinguishes theoretical pass-through from empirical pass-through
- Handles intra-class variation as a technical (not rhetorical) question
Ready to practice?
Identify the counterfactual, pick an identification strategy (diff-in-diff, synthetic control), survive the Daubert standard.
Build a damages-calculation caseDrills are free to start. Matched to Analysis Group's practice area.
Common Mistakes in Analysis Group Interviews
- !Treating this like a strategy consulting interview. Analysis Group is an economics consulting firm — the analytical vocabulary is difference-in-differences, synthetic control, Daubert standard, and damages calculation, not 3Cs / Porter's Five Forces. Use the right language or the interviewer concludes you haven't read the firm's work.
- !Weak econometrics fundamentals. Candidates who can't explain what makes a causal estimate credible (identification, parallel trends, threats to inference) fail the first-round technical probes. Review your graduate-level econometrics notes before interviewing.
- !Ignoring the courtroom context. Analysis Group's work supports econometric expert witnesses — every analysis must survive cross-examination. Candidates who don't think about Daubert-style methodological attacks miss why the firm cares about robustness checks.
- !Under-preparing the HEOR / antitrust economics / IP valuation specialisations. Analysis Group organises by practice area (health economics, antitrust, IP, labour, energy) — candidates who can't name which practice matches their background look uncurious.
- !Presenting results without uncertainty. Point estimates without confidence intervals or sensitivity ranges signal a research immaturity the firm filters out fast.
What recent Analysis Group candidates say
“Hi have you guys heard a consulting firm Analysis Group? It's an economic consulting company, what the exit opportunities look like at those type of firm? If my target is PE firms or tech firm corp strategies, do I have a shot if I work there for 2 years?”
How Analysis Group Differs
| vs. | How Analysis Group differs |
|---|---|
| Mckinsey | Analysis Group is an economics consulting firm built around expert-witness testimony and econometric analysis; McKinsey is a strategy consulting firm. Analysis Group cases test causal inference, damages calculation, and class certification economics — not MECE business frameworks. If the word 'Daubert standard' doesn't mean anything to you, McKinsey is the better fit. |
| Oliver-wyman | Oliver Wyman's actuarial and financial-services work overlaps with Analysis Group's finance practice on paper, but the audience differs: OW serves corporate clients making commercial decisions, Analysis Group serves law firms and agencies preparing for litigation or regulatory review. Completely different deliverables. |
| Ey-parthenon | EY-Parthenon does commercial due diligence for PE; Analysis Group does antitrust economics, IP valuation, and HEOR for law firms. Same 'economic consulting' umbrella, very different day-to-day work. |
Run a real Analysis Group Manager case now
Live interviewer-led cases with an AI that listens, pushes back, and synthesises like a Analysis Group interviewer. Your prep learns from every case — the AI tracks what you ace and what you miss, and the next session targets exactly that.
Practice a Analysis Group case nowFree to start · No card required · Your first case in 2 minutes
Hear what a Analysis Group case sounds like
60-second sample — no mic, no signup.
Try a 90-second Analysis Groupprompt — get instant structure grading
Type your answer below. Our AI grades clarity, MECE, hypothesis quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a PhD to get hired at Analysis Group?
Do I need Stata, R, or Python for the Analysis Group interview?
Should I target antitrust, HEOR, or IP at Analysis Group — how do I know which fits?
Will Analysis Group ask me about the Daubert standard in the interview?
Does Analysis Group require a writing sample or research presentation?
What's the difference between Analysis Group, Cornerstone Research, and NERA?
Continue your Analysis Group prep
Further reading